Isn't it time ...


Your subscription to Active Fund Strategies provides you with all of the materials necessary to shape and explain your investment philosophy, with proofs about why you do what you do . . . and, most importantly, why it works.

  • discover myth-busting research from every conceivable angle, including documented proof of the failure of the traditional approach
  • discover the 11-point report cards on every mutual fund, variable annuity subaccount and ETF
  • be able to analyze your own firm’s recommended list or build your own
  • gain access to the proprietary active fund management tool that successfully avoids large losses while capturing most of any rising market
  • obtain quick access to all decision-making fund changes
  • learn what statistical analysis tells us about fund selection, management and portfolio composition
  • see the folly that is the fund recommendations of the financial media, including the Forbes Honor Roll
  • be able to alter several market beating allocation models to create your own
  • gain access to the entire AFS client seminar script, which garners us much of our reputation
  • be able to book online or in-person continuing education classes that meet your schedule
  • Receive AFS’s monthly newsletter with a synopsis of the top 32 key publications in the field

Isn't it time to incorporate AFS's superior research and process into your client presentations and portfolio management?

Subscribe Now
What We Are Working On This Month
  • Do Newly-Created Funds Outperform Their Stale and Bloated Competitors? -Over the years, many financial publications publish articles and research reports claiming that newly-created funds, free of previously poor purchases and not bloated with too much AUM, outperform their older and bloated in-category competitors.  My research has always found there is zero correlation between superior performance and funds that were new to market.
    The results delivered by the newcomers of 2016 were no different.  There were 289 actively managed equity funds that posted their first-ever annual returns in 2016.  While 22% delivered top quartile performance in their category, 30% produced bottom quartile returns.  Furthermore, 44% finished 2016 in the top half, and 56% finished in the bottom half.  A coin toss produces similar results.  These performance results refute the view that newly created funds, able to concentrate on a manager’s top few picks and without a bloated asset base, have a performance advantage.